Темы

C Cеквенирование E E1b1b G I I1 I2 J J1 J2 N N1c Q R1a R1b Y-ДНК Австролоиды Альпийский тип Америнды Англия Антропологическая реконструкция Антропоэстетика Арабы Арменоиды Армия Руси Археология Аудио Аутосомы Африканцы Бактерии Балканы Венгрия Вера Видео Вирусы Вьетнам Гаплогруппы Генетика человека Генетические классификации Геногеография Германцы Гормоны Графики Греция Группы крови ДНК Деградация Демография в России Дерматоглифика Динарская раса Дравиды Древние цивилизации Европа Европейская антропология Европейский генофонд ЖЗЛ Живопись Животные Звёзды кино Здоровье Знаменитости Зодчество Иберия Индия Индоарийцы Интеръер Иран Ирландия Испания Исскуство История Италия Кавказ Канада Карты Кельты Китай Корея Криминал Культура Руси Латинская Америка Летописание Лингвистика Миграция Мимикрия Мифология Модели Монголоидная раса Монголы Мт-ДНК Музыка для души Мутация Народные обычаи и традиции Народонаселение Народы России Наши Города Негроидная раса Немцы Нордиды Одежда на Руси Ориентальная раса Основы Антропологии Основы ДНК-генеалогии и популяционной генетики Остбалты Переднеазиатская раса Пигментация Политика Польша Понтиды Прибалтика Природа Происхождение человека Психология РАСОЛОГИЯ РНК Разное Русская Антропология Русская антропоэстетика Русская генетика Русские поэты и писатели Русский генофонд Русь США Семиты Скандинавы Скифы и Сарматы Славяне Славянская генетика Среднеазиаты Средниземноморская раса Схемы Тохары Тураниды Туризм Тюрки Тюрская антропогенетика Укрология Уралоидный тип Филиппины Фильм Финляндия Фото Франция Храмы Хромосомы Художники России Цыгане Чехия Чухонцы Шотландия Эстетика Этнография Этнопсихология Юмор Япония генетика интеллект научные открытия неандерталeц

Поиск по этому блогу

понедельник, 20 апреля 2015 г.

Analyses of the additional Caucasoid admixture in Middle and South American Indians

At the bottom of this post is a plot for a K = 18 ADMIXTURE analysis of a global dataset. Above the plot is a table of the average admixture percentages for the six Middle and South American Indian populations that show Caucasoid admixture beyond the Caucasoid admixture which is found in all Amerindians, and which is a part of the Amerindian components in the analysis below.

In the next six plots, the first bars show the average relative admixture proportions for the Caucasoid components in each of the six Amerindian populations with additional Caucasoid admixture. The remaining bars are for the 20 populations whose average relative Caucasoid admixture proportions are closest to those for each of the six Amerindian populations, in order of decreasing similarity.
quechua-caucasoid
bolivian-caucasoid
mayan-caucasoid
zapotec-caucasoid
mixtec-caucasoid
pima-caucasoid
The plots show that the makeup of the additional Caucasoid admixture in the Quechuas, Bolivians, and Mayans is similar, and that the Spanish are at or near the top of the rankings of the Caucasoid populations in their similarity to the admixture in these three populations.
The Spanish are a bit further down in the similarity ranking for the Mixtecs, and they’re not in the top 20 of the rankings for the Zapotecs and Pimas. This is undoubtedly due to the amount of additional Caucasoid admixture in these three populations being so small that the most similar Caucasoid population cannot be accurately determined.
The table below gives the results of running the ALDER program to determine when the six Amerindian populations received their additional Caucasoid admixture. The admixture dates were calculated assuming that there are 29 years to a generation, and that the sample individuals were born in 1980. All of the estimated admixture dates are in the 17th or 18th centuries.
Test Pop  Ref A    Ref B    Generations  Years     Date
Quechua   Piapoco  Spanish  7.31 ± 0.88  212 ± 26  1768 AD
Bolivian  Piapoco  Spanish  9.84 ± 1.87  285 ± 54  1695 AD
Mayan     Mixe     Spanish  8.29 ± 1.02  240 ± 30  1740 AD
Zapotec   Mixe     Spanish  9.61 ± 1.09  279 ± 32  1701 AD
Mixtec    Mixe     Spanish  8.79 ± 1.21  255 ± 35  1725 AD
Pima      Mixe     Spanish  7.74 ± 1.14  224 ± 33  1756 AD
The results of these analyses make it clear that the additional Caucasoid admixture in Middle and South American Indians is primarily from the post-Columbian Spanish, and that I was wrong in the past for believing that it wasn’t.
Although these results provide no evidence that Middle or South American Indians have admixture from the White Gods, they also cannot completely rule it out. But if there is any admixture from the White Gods in these Indians, the amount of it must be much smaller than the amount of admixture from the post-Columbian Spanish. This would make sense, given that the Spanish, with their modern ships, came to the Americas in much larger numbers than the White Gods did, in their more primitive oceangoing vessels.
                    Quechua Bolivian Mayan Zapotec Mixtec  Pima
Northern Amerindian   60.61    62.01 66.10   73.90  77.93 98.15
Southern Amerindian   29.04    29.84 26.05   22.20  19.71  1.74
Northern European      3.55     2.47  2.17    1.05   0.72  0.00
Southern European      3.38     2.96  2.06    0.64   0.74  0.09
Eskimo                 0.73     0.59  0.27    1.04   0.23  0.00
Northern Mideastern    1.11     0.86  0.81    0.03   0.00  0.00
Northern Mongoloid     0.27     0.06  0.48    0.55   0.28  0.00
Kalash                 0.01     0.77  0.35    0.31   0.08  0.00
Southern Mideastern    0.50     0.29  0.62    0.00   0.06  0.00
Tubalar                0.49     0.00  0.19    0.13   0.00  0.00
Western Negroid        0.00     0.00  0.59    0.00   0.00  0.00
Melanesian             0.00     0.11  0.07    0.04   0.10  0.00
Veddoid                0.10     0.00  0.08    0.10   0.04  0.00
Eastern Mongoloid      0.14     0.03  0.08    0.00   0.03  0.00
Papuan                 0.07     0.00  0.01    0.00   0.07  0.00
Eastern Negroid        0.00     0.00  0.04    0.00   0.00  0.00
European HG            0.00     0.01  0.02    0.00   0.00  0.00
Bushman and Pygmy      0.00     0.00  0.00    0.00   0.00  0.00
world-k-18 

источник